Insights
Written for the working managing partner, ethics partner, and practice group leader.
No hype, no generic AI commentary. Regulator-grounded, evidence-first, plain English. Each piece protects a specific stakeholder and routes to a specific next step.
Latest
Recently published.
The law firm AI policy a small firm can sign
A law firm AI policy a 5–30 attorney firm can adopt this week: the seven sections it must cover, a tiered reliance standard, and the rule behind each.
What 8 midsize firms deployed: partnership reactions
Named midsize-firm AI deployments in 2024–2025: what each firm did first, who led, how the partnership voted, and what the 9th firm should learn.
Litigation drafting with AI: verification for standing orders
How to build an AI-assisted litigation drafting workflow your associates use, your partners trust, and federal-district standing orders accept.
What ABA Opinion 512 actually requires of a midsize firm
What the six Model Rules in Opinion 512 actually require of a 5–50 attorney firm, with the specific-consent language and supervision protocol.
Engagement-letter language for AI: sample clauses
Sample engagement-letter clauses that satisfy Opinion 512's specific-consent standard. For the ethics partner drafting the firm's language pack.
For midsize law firms
Browse by topic.
L1 · 4 articles
Ethics & Professional Responsibility
ABA Opinion 512, Rules 1.1/1.6/5.3, malpractice exposure, ethical walls.
- ABA Opinion 512 in practice: the midsize-firm playbook
- What ABA Opinion 512 actually requires of a midsize firm
- The law firm AI policy a small firm can sign
L2 · 1 article
Litigation & Drafting Workflow
Litigation drafting, transactional drafting, contract review, docketing.
- Litigation drafting with AI: verification for standing orders
Method & field notes